Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing |
On Saturday 10 March 2007 22:07, Michael Vanier wrote: > I agree 100%. This is the biggest limitation to using ocaml for large > projects. If it were fixed, ocaml would become an unstoppable juggernaut > ;-) Concurrency has to be on that list as well though. F# inherits concurrency from .NET and it is vastly easier to use than the last time I tried concurrency (on a supercomputer, in Fortran). However, a recent thread discussed the fledgling development of concurrency for OCaml and it sounded fascinating (although I still haven't found time to read it in detail!). -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists