On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 10:08 +0000, Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Friday 09 March 2007 02:02, skaller wrote:
> > Any comments on this idea?
> 
> Every now and again I want that, but I think there are much bigger gains to be 
> had elsewhere

Agreed.

>  and I'd rather those were addressed first.

Development in sequence of importance isn't the only model.

When working with Stroustrup and the C++ extensions subgroup,
on the (long list) of proposals, we'd vote.

Then we'd deal with the 3 proposals at the top of the list --
and the three at the bottom :)

-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net