Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Operator overloading
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Tom <tom.primozic@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Operator overloading |
On 09/03/07, skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > Actually, length can be defined in turns of fold: > > let len x = fold (fun acc elt -> acc + 1) 0 container > Yes, as long as x is a container. But how are you going to define a length of a snake using fold? Basically, I agree with you. I'm just saying that you can further increase the "typeclass" of length-able objects to almost anything. Why limit ourselves? - Tom