Browse thread
Size of produced parser: menhir vs ocamlyacc
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Size of produced parser: menhir vs ocamlyacc |
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 15:28 +0100, Joel Reymont wrote: > On Mar 30, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Markus Mottl wrote: > > > Not very. S-expressions, etc. But I wouldn't be surprised if Menhir > > performs better on more complex parsers, too. Generating parser code > > rather than tables may boost performance. > > Why did you pick menhir over ocamlyacc? I assume it was to use it in > server code but thought I would ask anyway. Note Ocamlyacc is LALR(1) whilst Menhir is LR(1). -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net