Browse thread
Interactive technical computing
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-03-08 (21:16) |
From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:36:18PM -0500, Jim Miller wrote: > What's I think is the interesting point about this discussion is "What are > the hurdles toward acceptance of any new language, scripting or not, into a > given community?" Obviously OCAML and the ML languages have deeply > penetrated some markets but haven't even dented others. There have been > lots of papers, studies, and discussion written on this ( > lambda-the-ultimate.org has many of them archived) so that's probably > something for a different thread to be read wearing flame-retardant > underthings. I'm currently contributing to a 45KLOC C library which I'm sure would be about 10 times smaller if written in a reasonable language. Putting aside the obvious cultural resistance to using a sensible language for this project, there is one technical hurdle: It needs to compile into a DLL which can be linked to other programs (in C and other languages). I can't generate such code using ocamlopt, at least not without using unsupported out-of-tree extensions. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat