Browse thread
int_of_string bug
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Florian Weimer <fw@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] int_of_string bug |
* Yaron Minsky: > That's a problem too, but there is at least a defensible reason for > that, which is that it is expensive to get integer overflow to throw > an exception. i386 and amd64 have hardware support for that, so it's not very expensive. There are pretty short RISC sequences for the checks, too. MLton uses the i386 hardware support, and I think you can disable the checks, so measuring the overhead shouldn't be too hard.