Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing
- Robert Fischer
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-03-09 (17:41) |
From: | Robert Fischer <RFischer@R...> |
Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing |
Weird -- I thought F# was having all kinds of performance problems. Got metrics? ~~ Robert. -----Original Message----- From: caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr]On Behalf Of Jon Harrop Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 11:26 AM To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing On Friday 09 March 2007 14:13, Robert Fischer wrote: > Performance of Ocaml's bytecode is slower than F#? Really? Performance of OCaml compiled to native code with ocamlopt is sometimes slower than F#, so yes. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs