Browse thread
int_of_string bug
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] int_of_string bug |
skaller wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 21:26 -0400, Yaron Minsky wrote: > > # int_of_string "1073741824";; > > - : int = -1073741824 > > # int_of_string "1073741825";; > > Exception: Failure "int_of_string". Thats the behaviour on 32 bit systems. > # int_of_string "1073741824";; > - : int = 1073741824 > # int_of_string "1073741825";; > - : int = 1073741825 But 64 bit systems get it right. Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "Java, the best argument for Smalltalk since C++." -- Frank Winkler