On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:58, Alain Frisch wrote:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
> > The moral is: don't try to write idiomatic Python in OCaml.
>
> I think the moral is rather: read the OP's email more carefully. He
> doesn't want to translate some Python examples into OCaml by hand, he
> wants to implement a Python interpreter in OCaml.

My mistake. In that case, I agree that CPS is the obvious solution. Perhaps it 
is possible to do something equivalent by explicitly storing the state 
and "program counter" in the function when yield is called?

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
OCaml for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists