Browse thread
Bug in ocamlyacc
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-04-24 (05:29) |
From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Bug in ocamlyacc |
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 23:03 +0100, David Allsopp wrote: > With regards to the closing comment to Bug Report #4251: > > > doligez: We won't spend time fixing minor issues in ocamlyacc because the > > future is in menhir. The workaround is obvious anyway. > > Does this mean that menhir will be moved to the O'Caml distribution at some > point? I don't think I'm the only person reading this list who doesn't use > Menhir (at the moment) solely because it is not part of the *standard* > O'Caml distribution. I won't use Menhir for that reason either. My product, Felix, is designed to 'build out of the box' on all platforms with minimal pre-requisites, which happen to be: you need (a) Python (b) Ocaml (c) A C/C++ compiler * with development versions of libs People have enough trouble with just 3 pre-reqs without me adding another code base/product to the list -- it is particularly messy on Windows (native) platforms. -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net