[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-04-22 (14:35) |
From: | Sam Steingold <sds@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] backtrace output: feature request |
> * Xavier Leroy <Knivre.Yrebl@vaevn.se> [2007-04-22 12:10:57 +0200]: > >> how do I get backtraces on exceptions in then top-level? >> I want to see something like: >> h called g on line 1 >> g called f on line 1 >> f raised invalid_argument on line 1 > > Currently, you cannot. Conceivably, this would be the same mechanism > as outlined above (i.e. making backtrace data available from Caml). > However, you'd get a backtrace in terms of file names and line > numbers, which don't make that much sense for toplevel definitions. yes they do. file=function name. > Functions names don't really exist in compiled code. sure - but file/line annotations do, and they can be easily augmented with function names. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) http://truepeace.org http://jihadwatch.org http://pmw.org.il http://openvotingconsortium.org http://iris.org.il http://dhimmi.com Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward.