On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Harrison, John R wrote:

> | This topic comes up from time to time... My take on this is that
> read-only
> | arrays or strings are not badly needed.
>
> Of course, this is a matter of opinion. In the end you didn't offer
> a solution to the specific problem I had. I'll still need to adopt
> an expensive and/or ugly workaround if I really want to protect myself
> against OCaml's mutable strings. However, I accept that my application
> is not typical.

It seems to me that you don't have a problem, but you imagine you have
one... which is much better than the other way around :-)

http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2006/05/f603bc5e2fec357d8a36d807664072e6.en.html


Cheers,

Martin

--
Martin Jambon
http://martin.jambon.free.fr