Browse thread
How important are circular lists/recursive objects?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Stefan Monnier <monnier@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: How important are circular lists/recursive objects? |
> The question is: if this behavior was completely outlawed, and either you
> couldn't build up circular lists/recursive data structures of this type at
> all, or had to call special functions (List.circularize, say), to create
> them, would this be a signifigant problem? Does anyone actually use this
> construct, and if so, for what?
This is the case in SML: you need to go through a `ref' cell in order to
create a cycle. This has very rarely been presented as
a serious limitation. OCaml's trick is occasionally useful, but I don't
think anybody would lose her sleep over it.
Stefan