On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 10:09 -0400, Jacques Carette wrote:
> Pierre Weis wrote:
> >              Relational types in Caml
> >   
> Very nice indeed.  As a matter of fact, I was just reading (and 
> enjoying) the ESOP paper in the plane yesterday!
> 
> My question is: why is this done as a pre-processor instead of as an 
> extension of metaocaml?  

So that ordinary Ocaml users have access to it?

-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net