Browse thread
Teaching bottomline, part 3: what should improve.
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Teaching bottomline, part 3: what should improve. |
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 12:39:29AM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > If you want your students to be future proof then you would do well > to prepare them for massively parallel computing on CPUs with > hundreds or even thousands of cores. OCaml it completely > ill-equipped for this. In contrast, F# provides native > threads/locks/semaphores/threads/threadpools inherited from .NET as > well as async programming via extra syntax. Concurrency is beautiful > in F# and it works today. F# scales to hundreds or thousands of cores? If the OP wants to teach his students about massively parallel computing, he should avoid the Microsoft lock-in and teach them about it on Linux clusters. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat