Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Teaching bottomline, part 3: what should improve.
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Richard Jones <rich@a...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Teaching bottomline, part 3: what should improve.
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 12:39:29AM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote:
> If you want your students to be future proof then you would do well
> to prepare them for massively parallel computing on CPUs with
> hundreds or even thousands of cores. OCaml it completely
> ill-equipped for this. In contrast, F# provides native
> threads/locks/semaphores/threads/threadpools inherited from .NET as
> well as async programming via extra syntax. Concurrency is beautiful
> in F# and it works today.

F# scales to hundreds or thousands of cores?

If the OP wants to teach his students about massively parallel
computing, he should avoid the Microsoft lock-in and teach them about
it on Linux clusters.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones
Red Hat