[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | tail rec |
I have a silly idea. Introduce a new construction: let tailrec f .. This is the same as let rec except it checks every direct call to f is in tail position (and bombs out the compiler if not). [Maybe this can be done with camlp4, though I think it might be hard?] I think this could be useful for newbies learning functional programming, and perhaps even experts looking for performance issues. If a let closure of f is made, a warning is issued, eg: let tailrec f x = let g x = f x in (* WARNING *) 1 + g (x - 1) (* not tail, but not explicit call of f *) The annotation does NOT prove a function is tail rec, but if the compiler bombs, it proves the function is not tail rec. Comments? -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net