Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Teaching bottomline, part 3: what should improve.
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Brian Hurt <bhurt@j...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Teaching bottomline, part 3: what should improve.
Robert C Fischer wrote:

> ...and locks and threads are not a viable long-term solution to the 
> problem of concurrency in general.  You're future-proofing enough by 
> teaching them functional languages: Erlang and Cilk are closer to the 
> needed future.
>
I think you mean "Haskell+STM" instead of Cilk.  Cilk isn't a 
particularly functional language (being effectively C plus a little bit).

Brian