Browse thread
Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics
- Yuanchen Zhu
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics |
On Thursday 31 May 2007 10:22:34 Yuanchen Zhu wrote: > Yes, I am aware of the inefficiency here. Although because of branch > prediction on modern CPUs, the actual running time overhead would not > be that big. That is not true. > My point, however, is that MLton and OCaml are being fed the same > code, and if OCaml performs specializing and proper inlining, it will > get almost twice its current performance. The OCaml compilers are designed to handle good code. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?e