Browse thread
Upgrading sexplib-2.7.0 to camlp4 3.10
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-05-01 (16:39) |
From: | Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@g...> |
Subject: | Re: Upgrading sexplib-2.7.0 to camlp4 3.10 |
On 5/1/07, Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com> wrote: > > On May 1, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > > > However I suggest you comment that part and try to go further with > > poly variants at a first glance. > > Are you saying that RfTag used to apply to regular variants? > > What about RfInh, how is that encoded now? Is this what you referred > to as poly variants? No, no, no there is still a difference between poly variants and classic ones. When I wrote `id it's for polymorphic ones. However there are now all in the same category: ctyp, so inherit is useless since it was made to be able to inject a type name in a polymorphic declaration. -- Nicolas Pouillard