Browse thread
Upgrading sexplib-2.7.0 to camlp4 3.10
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: Upgrading sexplib-2.7.0 to camlp4 3.10 |
On 5/1/07, Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com> wrote: > > On May 1, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > > > No, no, no there is still a difference between poly variants and > > classic ones. > > > > When I wrote `id it's for polymorphic ones. > > Then I would use <:ctyp< $id$ >> to match variants and `id to match > poly variants, right? To be consistent on notations <:ctyp< $id$ >> to match variants <:ctyp< `$id$ >> to match polymorphic variants -- Nicolas Pouillard