Because we assumed we were just too stupid to get them to work. Or at
least I did.

Cheers,
 David

On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 10:25 +0100, Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 May 2007 10:25:08 Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > > > The much incomplete web site is at
> > > > <http://jocaml.inria.fr>
> > >
> > > Now that *really* *does* look interesting!
> >
> > I tried to grab the source tarball, but got a 404 not found :-(.
> >
> > Patience Erik, patience!
> 
> This is outrageous. We could have had JoCaml by now if Luc hadn't been posting 
> on mailing lists. I'm shocked and appalled...
> 
> By the way, apologies to the ten people who downloaded my original bytecode 
> tarball of Smoke that had dependencies on other code that wasn't there. It 
> should all be fixed now. Why does nobody ever tell me whether or not my demos 
> work?! :-)
>