[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <markus.mottl@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Inlining and code placement |
On 5/3/07, mmottl@janestcapital.com <mmottl@janestcapital.com> wrote: > concerning my email about inlining from a few days ago: it seems that > the majority of differences is not so much due to the inlining level but > due to code placement. This means that playing with the inlining level > beyond some reasonable, small value is likely to not have any strong > impact on the performance of the program. (Sorry, this went to the wrong alias, it wasn't intended for the OCaml mailining list - but isn't that much off topic either ;). Markus -- Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mottl@gmail.com