On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 03:06:36AM -0700, Robert Roessler wrote:
> Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> >...
> >As I said, I'd prefer not to use OCamlMakefile if possible... Does such
> >a choice look unwise to you all ?
> 
> Not at all... but then, perhaps like you, I believe that "make" is 
> perfectly adequate for most small-to-medium build tasks, and that 
> truly "open" software is designed to be built with standard tools 
> available in either the stock distribution of OCaml or at least easily 
> found for the dominant platforms: Windows, the major *nix distros, and 
> Mac OS X. ;)

Sorry, I must have missed the OP's objection to using OCamlMakefile.
But in any case, it's just a (big, complex) Makefile, so even if you
don't want to use it as-is, you can look at what it does, and adopt a
subset of its rules for your application.

-- 
Eric Cooper             e c c @ c m u . e d u