On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:17 +0100, Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Thursday 31 May 2007 06:50:05 Yuanchen Zhu wrote:
> > The performance numbers were as following:
> >
> > Ocaml (unsafe) : user: 39.674s, real: 41.356s
> > MLton (safe):  user:  17.981s, real: 21.968s
> 
> You may be interested to know that there are no optimizing SML compilers for 
> AMD64, which is a much better platform for numerical work:
> 
>   http://www.ffconsultancy.com/languages/ray_tracer/results.html

I'm afraid your information is out of date. MLton runs on AMD64 now.


-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net