Browse thread
Custom operators in the revised syntax
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Custom operators in the revised syntax |
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 16:15 +0200, Loup Vaillant wrote: > 2007/5/11, dmitry grebeniuk <gds-mlsts@moldavcable.com>: > I tend to agree when one says custom operators are evil. However, when > the default syntax uses operators, the custom ones are a net win : a > wise programmer will use their semantic load carefully (big nums, for > example), and sparsely, so the code is more readable. In Ocaml, there's no overloading: custom operators have big advantages for things like int32, int64, bignums, matrices etc, where other languages can simply use overloading. -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net