Browse thread
tail rec
-
skaller
- Erik de Castro Lopo
-
Basile STARYNKEVITCH
-
skaller
- Jonathan Bryant
-
skaller
- Oliver Bandel
- Brian Hurt
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jonathan Bryant <jtbryant@v...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] tail rec |
>>> I have a silly idea. Introduce a new construction: >>> >>> let tailrec f .. >>> >>> This is the same as let rec except it checks every direct call to f >>> is in tail position (and bombs out the compiler if not). A question I have about tail recursion in general: let f x = (* Do something *) let g x = (* Do something *); f x let h x = (* Do something *); g x Does the compiler optimize the calls (f x) and (g x) into tail calls? If so, how would the let railrec f x = ... let tailrec g x = ... let tailrec h x = ... syntax handle/help this? Or would it hinder it? --Jonathan