[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Joel Reymont <joelr1@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Inlining and code placement |
Markus, Do you care to elaborate? Thanks, Joel On May 3, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Markus Mottl wrote: > On 5/3/07, mmottl@janestcapital.com <mmottl@janestcapital.com> wrote: >> concerning my email about inlining from a few days ago: it seems that >> the majority of differences is not so much due to the inlining >> level but >> due to code placement. This means that playing with the inlining >> level >> beyond some reasonable, small value is likely to not have any strong >> impact on the performance of the program. -- http://wagerlabs.com/