Browse thread
Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics
-
Yuanchen Zhu
- Jon Harrop
- Daniel_Bünzli
-
Christophe Raffalli
-
Jon Harrop
- Christophe Raffalli
-
Jon Harrop
- Christophe Raffalli
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christophe Raffalli <Christophe.Raffalli@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics |
Jon Harrop a écrit : > On Thursday 31 May 2007 16:15:50 Christophe Raffalli wrote: > >> Either use array of records (you will have one box), one array of double >> size or two separate arrays (no boxing at all). >> > > That would be good advice were kx and ky both floats but, alas, one is not. So > using a record doesn't buy you anything (only all-float records are unboxed) > and you cannot use a double length array. I tried two arrays and it was > significantly faster. > > Oh, I did not see that kx was an int ... So two records in the only solution (and it is also preferable for MLTon as I imagine that array of tuple are not optimized ...) Christophe Raffalli