2007/5/30, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com>:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
>
> > I'm having a look at it now. I had thought that it was an experimental version
> > of OCaml that with a concurrent GC but that seems to be completely wrong.
> >
> > Will OCaml have a concurrent GC in the future?
>
> How much does a concurrent GC actually buy in comparison to
> multiple processes each with their own GC and a robust way
> of passing data between processes?
>

As far as I know, the developement team had made it quite clear that
there will be no concurent GC (not in the near future, at least).


> Erik
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Erik de Castro Lopo
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the
> day they start making vacuum cleaners." -- Ernst Jan Plugge
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>