Browse thread
Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics
- Yuanchen Zhu
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics |
On Thursday 31 May 2007 16:15:50 Christophe Raffalli wrote: > Either use array of records (you will have one box), one array of double > size or two separate arrays (no boxing at all). That would be good advice were kx and ky both floats but, alas, one is not. So using a record doesn't buy you anything (only all-float records are unboxed) and you cannot use a double length array. I tried two arrays and it was significantly faster. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?e