On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 02:27:34AM +0200, ketti wrote:
> On 5/13/07, Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >I've a tiny patch to do that:
> >
> >2 ``List.mem`` [1;2;3]
> >
> >I think that extension harmless, any thoughts?
> 
> 
> What about: 2 ´List.mem´ [1;2;3] ?

Or:
    2 `(List.mem) [1;2;3]

Then you could even have operators with arguments.  IIRC this idea (not
this particular syntax) was proposed for Haskell' but wasn't worth the
effort to make work with their current `single-op` syntax.  Maybe it's
worth it in this case?

-- 
Chris Stork   <>  Support eff.org!  <>   http://www.ics.uci.edu/~cstork/
OpenPGP fingerprint:  B08B 602C C806 C492 D069  021E 41F3 8C8D 50F9 CA2F