Browse thread
Teaching bottomline, part 3: what should improve.
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | tab@s... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Teaching bottomline, part 3: what should improve. |
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:04:21AM +0200, Markus E.L. wrote: > let len (s :string) : int = ... ? yes I know about this but I'ld rather create and modify an .mli than have this horrible syntax inlined in the implementation. The signature code (the one in sig end) is nice, and I want to use that for describing my functions, so that implementation and description stays reasonably distinct. OCaml let you do that inline when you create a module in a file: module xx : sig .... end = struct .... end but for a file (which is also a module), you need to have a separate file (a .mli) to do that.. and that's my point. Cheers, -- Vincent Hanquez