Edgar Friendly wrote:

> But it doesn't match some expectations I have about float literals.  The
> following are all float literals:
> 
> 3.14      (* no problem here *)
> 6.022E23  (* no problem here *)
> 9.109e-31 (* still no problem *)
> 2.        (* a float - blank decimal part *)
> 1e6       (* an integer?  no, a float without a .  Problem.*)
> 13        (* valid as a float, according to the above definition *)
> 
> Does anyone else find the last two cases kind of odd?

I do not find the second last case odd (all languages I have used
consider that a float), but I do for the last one.

Erik
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Neither noise nor information is predictable."
  -- Ray Kurzweil