Browse thread
Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics
-
Yuanchen Zhu
- Jon Harrop
- Daniel_Bünzli
- Christophe Raffalli
- Christophe Raffalli
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Yuanchen Zhu <yzhu@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics |
> I agree that more optimization by the OCaml compiler might be nice (e.g. > specializing higher-order functions over float arrays) but I do not believe > it would have helped in this case. > Haven't the tests shown that specializing higher-order functions would help A LOT in this case? Running time is almost halfed when the high-order function is manually expanded using for-loops and reference cells, approaching that of MLton.