Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Stephan Tolksdorf <andorxor@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics 
Richard Jones wrote:
> Another article on the same topic:
> 
>   http://lwn.net/Articles/82495/
> 

3% probably lies well in the error of margin. I find this comment much
more informative and in accordance with my experiences:

http://lwn.net/Articles/167474/

Without inlining a lot of modern C++ code would be unusable slow. As
Alain said, inlining allows you to use abstractions without having to
pay the usual penalty for it.

Regards,
   Stephan