Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
ocamldoc -pack
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Vladimir Shabanov <vshabanoff@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamldoc -pack
I personally don't use ocamlbuild, since it doesn't support C++ files.
And even if it does, the -pack is ocamldoc problem, not ocamlbuild
one.

2007/6/5, Francisco Jos? Valverde Albacete <fva@tsc.uc3m.es>:
> er... Wouldn't this be the kind of scripting that ocamlbuild would be
> most useful for?
>
> Regards,
>
>     Fran Valverde
>
> Vladimir Shabanov wrote:
> > I'm also looked for this feature some time ago. Seems that there is no
> > support in ocamldoc for it.
> >
> > The quick and dirty solution I've used is to catenate all packed .ml &
> > .mli in one file and then use ocamldoc on it.
> >
> > Here the little script I've used (it just print catenated modules,
> > which are passed as arguments, and if you have .mli file you must pass
> > it just before corresponding .ml):
> > http://camlosg.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/camlosg/trunk/camlosg/Make/pack_in_one.ml?view=markup
> >
> >
> > But it would be much better if this will be supported in ocamldoc
> > directly.
> >
> > 2007/6/5, Yaron Minsky <yminsky@cs.cornell.edu>:
> >> As it happens we're looking for more-or-less the same feature.  Is it
> >> true,
> >> as this post suggests, that ocamldoc is broken with respect to pack'd
> >> libraries?
> >>
> >> y
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/1/07, Sean McLaughlin <seanmcl@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> >   I'd like to see a -pack option for ocamldoc.  It would be nice for
> >> packed modules to
> >> > have accurate documentation.  I saw something about this in a post
> >> > from 2002, but nothing afterwards.   Is this a possibility in the
> >> future?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Sean