Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2007-06-01 (09:22)
From: Stephan Tolksdorf <andorxor@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics
Richard Jones wrote:
> Another article on the same topic:

3% probably lies well in the error of margin. I find this comment much 
more informative and in accordance with my experiences:

Without inlining a lot of modern C++ code would be unusable slow. As 
Alain said, inlining allows you to use abstractions without having to 
pay the usual penalty for it.