Browse thread
Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics
- Yuanchen Zhu
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Pierre Etchemaïté <petchema@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics |
Le Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:08:08 +1000, skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> a écrit : > On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 15:39 +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > > > A functional array implemented as a balanced binary tree needs the number of > > elements (size) of a sub tree just to index into the tree. > > It might be worth considering a functional version of Judy arrays: > > http://judy.sourceforge.net/ The VList looks interesting too: O(1) operations (amortized), and functional; Someone even already wrote a pure OCaml implementation: http://www.imada.sdu.dk/~bardur/personal/45-programs/