Browse thread
Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics
- Yuanchen Zhu
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics |
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 02:42:15 Jon Harrop wrote: > On Monday 04 June 2007 23:44:13 Pierre Etchemaïté wrote: > > The VList looks interesting too: O(1) operations (amortized), and > > functional; Someone even already wrote a pure OCaml implementation: > > Looks like a skip list with arrays instead of trees. Incidentally, I should probably explain that I like the idea of a functional array based upon balanced binary trees because it allows fast concatenation and subarrays. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?e