Browse thread
Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics
-
Yuanchen Zhu
- Jon Harrop
- Daniel_Bünzli
- Christophe Raffalli
- Christophe Raffalli
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Eric Cooper <ecc@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics |
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:15:04AM -0400, Stephen Weeks wrote: > I think it's better to encourage people to program in the cleanest > way possible, and then to profile and improve their code if > necessary. It seems natural to use a version control system so that one can evolve and maintain the "clean" trunk of the code, while keeping the accumulated wisdom of manual performance optimizations as branches / patch sets. I wonder if there are any opportunities for integration of this model into the language itself (type-safe patch sets?) or its tools. -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u