Browse thread
Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics
- Yuanchen Zhu
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics |
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 11:36 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > skaller wrote: > > > Someone (as usual no URL sorry) wrote a paper roughly titled > > 'guaranteed optimisations' which is actually an interesting > > perspective on this whole scenario. > > I found a bunch of slides titled "The Guaranteed Optimization > Clause of the Macro-Writer's Bill of Rights": > > http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~chaynes/danfest/dyb.pdf The paper i think of was a master or PhD thesis.. -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net