On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 05:03:25PM +0100, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
> >Pass the stack as an argument to those functions that need it.

> Precisely this is how you would have to do this with ML. But then, if
> you do not just deal with one stack, but have more complicated context,
> OR if you have to start thinking about threading the stack through
> functions that do not use it, but use other functions which use it,
> things easily get quite awkward.

So could one "hide the plumbing" in a monad?

- Dirk