Browse thread
Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics
- Yuanchen Zhu
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics |
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 17:52 +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Friday 01 June 2007 15:41:43 skaller wrote: > > Paying 4 times more dollars for a CPU that is twice as fast is a > > very expensive solution compared to an optimising compiler .. > > Much more cost effective to implement more effective compiler features in > house. All you need is the author of an excellent whole-program optimizing > compiler for some related language. Or you could make an SML->Ocaml preprocessor .. allowing rapid prototyping with Ocaml and production compilation with another tool. -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net