Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
We should all be forking
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2007-06-05 (19:20)
From: Joel Reymont <joelr1@g...>
Subject: jocaml vs camlp3l
I'm gonna go bonkers soon. Suppose I know and quite like Erlang but  
dislike its syntax and performance on non-IO things. I'm also quite  
fond of OCaml.

Should I go with JoCaml? Camlp3l? Why?

	Thanks, Joel

On Jun 5, 2007, at 8:13 PM, Chris King wrote:

> I'm curious, have you considered trying camlp3l [1] to parallelize
> your raytracer?  It uses high-level constructs ("skeletons") to
> describe parallelizable functions, e.g. for a raytracer you can
> essentially just say "farm out each row to a different computing
> node".

--      - EasyLanguage to C# translator  - Blog