Browse thread
We should all be forking
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Joel Reymont <joelr1@g...> |
| Subject: | jocaml vs camlp3l |
I'm gonna go bonkers soon. Suppose I know and quite like Erlang but
dislike its syntax and performance on non-IO things. I'm also quite
fond of OCaml.
Should I go with JoCaml? Camlp3l? Why?
Thanks, Joel
On Jun 5, 2007, at 8:13 PM, Chris King wrote:
> I'm curious, have you considered trying camlp3l [1] to parallelize
> your raytracer? It uses high-level constructs ("skeletons") to
> describe parallelizable functions, e.g. for a raytracer you can
> essentially just say "farm out each row to a different computing
> node".
--
http://topdog.cc - EasyLanguage to C# translator
http://wagerlabs.com - Blog