Browse thread
Ocaml license
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Grant Olson <olsongt@v...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Ocaml license |
> -----Original Message----- > From: christopherleeconway@gmail.com > > You shouldn't have to worry about the OCaml license at all. > The LGPL allows you to distribute code that merely links > against the standard library (as opposed to extending or > modifying the library code) under a license of your choosing. > > Chris > Thanks, but I'm asking if I still need to indicate that I'm using LGPL code and reproduce the copywrite, or the the generated .exe is considered a separate work. That is, does it link to any of the LGPL code? And the same question with the Q-licensed components.