[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] syntax changes from 3.08 to 3.10 |
On 7/11/07, Sebastien Ferre <ferre@irisa.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> moving my application from OCaml 3.08 to 3.10,
> I encountered 2 syntax problems, i.e. syntax errors
> when compiling:
>
> 1. record copy and modification:
>
> {f x with y = 1; z = 2}
>
> this can be solved by parenthesizing the
> evaluation of the record to be copied.
>
> {(f x) with y = 1; z = 2}
Yes you now have to put these parentheses.
> 2. object copy and modification in a method:
>
> {< x = 1; y = 2>}
>
> OCaml says the first field is a bool instead of an int,
> which leads me to think it parenthesizes in the following way:
>
> {< x = (1; y = 2)>}
>
> In fact, this behaviour is only when compiling with camlp4o:
>
> ocamlc -pp ocamlp4o ...
Yes that's an awful bug that is already fixed in CVS.
>
> The work-around I found to implement a copy method is as follows:
>
> class c =
> object (self)
> val x = 0
> val y = 0
>
> method copy = (Oo.copy self) # copy_aux
> method private copy_aux = x <- 1; y <- 2; self
> end
>
>
> Has anybody encountered the same problem ? Is there a better workaround
> ? Is it a bug ?
>
A better workaround is:
class c =
object (self)
val x = 0
val y = 0
method set_x newx = {< x = newx >}
method set_y newy = {< y = newy >}
method copy = (self#set_x 1)#set_y 2
end
But this camlp4 bug is very nasty (perhaps you can try to move these
calls in a file that does not require camlp4o)
--
Nicolas Pouillard