Browse thread
Weak hash table for attaching extra data to an object
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Weak hash table for attaching extra data to an object |
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 00:09:40 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:44:15PM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > > I think this is an important design choice that people should be aware of > > when they first write the code. If you think the product types inside > > your expr > > Richard's point was precisely about *not* being able to change such a > design choice. There can be a lot of reasons for that, for example (even > though this was not Richard's situation AFAICT) not being the author of > the data structure you want to decorate. Yes. Laterally, the point can be addressed by making library writers aware of the points that I made. I think Markus Mottl once said that all libraries should include phantom types... -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?e