Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Sorted list
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Sorted list
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 13:17 -0400, Brian Hurt wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Richard Jones wrote:
> 
> > But what's wrong with extlib?  Now I know it's not the "Standard"
> > distribution, but that's a mere packaging issue.
> 
> Actually, extlib is a wonderfull example of what's wrong with this idea. 
> I have grown to have major philosophical differences with extlib- 

That doesn't make the idea wrong. As I said in another post, I have
major philosophical differences with some of the Ocaml standard libs--
Str being mentioned with considerable distaste. I add the lexing
system to that too, and probably more.

My point being: it isn't just 3PLs, but also the Ocaml standard
libs, that can have problems: this shouldn't stand in the way
of improving and augmenting the library.

-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net