Browse thread
If OCaml were a car
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] If OCaml were a car |
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 06:50:24 Luca de Alfaro wrote:
> The only thing about Ocaml I mind, is that it a bit like German is, in that
> all the verbs at the end come. And there nothing wrong is, but it for some
> strange reading makes, and it strange is that this from France comes.
>
> I still somewhat puzzled am, at reading:
>
> let f x =
> [humonguous definition 50 lines spanning]
> in List.iter f l
>
> because the only way I make sense of this can, is by first looking at where
> f used is, and only then reading its definition.
> I much rather write would:
>
> do List.iter f l
> where f x = [humonguous definition]
>
> Maybe this problem with Ocamlp4 solvable is?
Get this to good effect in vanilla OCaml by copying F# you can:
let ( |> ) x f = f x
l |> List.iter
(fun e -> ...)
--
Yoda, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
OCaml for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?e