Browse thread
Question on polymorphic typing for curried functions
- Christopher Kauffman
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christopher Kauffman <kauffman@c...> |
| Subject: | Question on polymorphic typing for curried functions |
I am looking for a bit of information on the behavior of curried functions wrt
polymorphic arguments. For instance, in the following example, using a curried
function seems to lose the nice polymorphism that I desire.
# let genf f a b = f a b;;
val genf : ('a -> 'b -> 'c) -> 'a -> 'b -> 'c = <fun>
# let specf = genf (<);;
val specf : '_a -> '_a -> bool = <fun>
# specf 1 2;;
- : bool = true
# specf;;
- : int -> int -> bool = <fun>
An alternative definition for the specific 'specf' maintains polymorphism of its
arguments.
# let specf a b = genf (<) a b;;
val specf : 'a -> 'a -> bool = <fun>
# specf 1 2;;
- : bool = true
# specf 1.0 2.0;;
- : bool = true
# specf;;
- : 'a -> 'a -> bool = <fun>
Is there a set of rules or guidelines that determine when argument types are
specialized versus staying polymorphic?
Cheers,
Chris